Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

Talkingship – Video Games, Movies, Music & Laughs | April 29, 2026

Scroll to top

Top

TV
58 Comments

Sherlock Season Finale Explained: How Did Moriarty Survive?

Sherlock Season Finale Explained: How Did Moriarty Survive?

SPOILER WARNING for all of Sherlock so far.

Well, that was quite the ending, wasn’t it? Just when you thought John and Sherlock had parted, when all was seemingly lost…Moriarty turns up to reunite everyone. It was an ending that no one saw coming, and one that’s going to take a lot of explaining. Fortunately, we have at least a year before the next series starts, so we’ve got plenty of time to hypothesise. Here are three theories for how Moriarty survived his suicide at the end of Series 2.

1. He faked his death.

This is the most obvious one. Although we saw Moriarty put a gun in his mouth and pull the trigger, there must have been some trickery along the way. We never actually saw much blood spatter or brain matter, which is weird for a death that involved blowing his brains out. We saw a small pool of blood around his head, but that’s pretty much it.

So Moriarty could have used a fake gun. Put it in his mouth, pull the trigger so it makes a bang, and then fall onto a concealed blood bag. Not too complex.

But there’s an issue with that. Would Sherlock really fall for it? Surely he would notice the abnormal blood spatter or the lack of brains? The only real way to explain this is that Sherlock was in on it, but finding a motive for that is difficult. So this theory needs a little more fleshing out to work.

2. A body double?

You could argue that the Moriarty we saw on the roof wasn’t the real Moriarty, and that we actually saw a clone or a look a like or something. But that’s ridiculous and wrong. The Moriarty on the roof acted and looked a lot like the real one. So let’s move on.

3. Moriarty didn’t survive.

This is an interesting one. Moriarty announced his big return by playing a prerecorded video with a voice modulator. It wasn’t live. There is every possibility that Moriarty is still dead, and someone else is pretending to be him.

But who? Well, Mycroft. He said earlier in the episode that he didn’t want Sherlock to go away/die, and although he may try and hide it, he loves his brother. Perhaps, to stop him from going away, he staged Moriarty’s return. He is one of the few people that has access to every TV in the country, after all.

If not Mycroft, perhaps some other, new character. The third Holmes brother that was mentioned in the episode, perhaps. Or perhaps Moriarty has siblings. It could be anyone.

But this theory also has an issue. After the credits, Moriarty himself clearly turns to the camera and acknowledges the audience, saying “Miss Me?”. This seems to be an indication that Moriarty is actually back. So this theory might be wrong.

Those are our three theories for how Moriarty did the impossible. Of course, there are many, many more. Got one of your own? Let us know in the comments…

  • Demosthenes

    The third theory, while possible, is highly unlikely for two reasons. One: In the eyes of the fans, a “Moriarty tease” where he really doesn’t come back would be treated with contempt and would disappoint more than a few. Also, the series would lose most of its momentum and would most likely have to start anew. But who knows; with all of these cliffhangers I wouldn’t be surprised if Moffat and Gatiss have something else up their sleeves.

  • VeveJones

    Here’s my theory:

    In Series 1 and 2, Moriarty was actually played by a set of twins. One of the twins died on that rooftop, but the other twin is alive and well. I think he’s dead because I doubt that Sherlock would fall for a fake suicide a couple feet from him and you can see what looks like brain matter in the blood spray. A few justifications for my twins theory:

    1) In Sir ACD’s works, Moriarty has two brothers–the writers have shown that they like to adapt pieces of information from the actual works and put them into the new series.
    2) How would Moriarty have the time to operate his vast criminal network (one that took Sherlock two years to unravel) and still have time to develop relationships with Molly and Kitty (the reporter in episode 2.3) as part of his schemes? It also never struck me that Moriarty was a person who would allow a right-hand man/woman to help him run his network. Who else would you trust more than your brother in crime?
    3) This one is more of a reach, but if you consider his re-entrance at the pool in episode 1.3, Moriarty says “I’m so changeable.” Is he changeable because the brothers consulted and concluded that Sherlock needs to be brought down?

  • VeveJones

    I agree. With the live action end-credits shot of Andrew Scott, it has to be assumed that the actor Moriarty is alive. A tease like that outside of the actual episode is strictly for the fans to indicate that Andrew Scott is returning to reprise the role in some fashion.

  • JohnD

    Perhaps my very favorite aspect of the series is the way in which Moffat and Gatiss love Conan Doyle’s original stories. The references abound, right down to AGRA on the flash drive, relating to the original adventures of Mary in Agra, India. Yes, they have merged some stories together and tweaked some names and places, but the major events have stayed largely true to the original stories. So it seems to me like far too much of a deviation from the canon to bring Moriarty back. Same goes for Irene Adler. Lest we forget, Conan Doyle wrote 56 short stories and Moriarty appears in only one. So it’s not like there isn’t anywhere else for the series to go.

    An interesting aspect is the increased appearance of Philip Anderson. He has an unusual interest in Sherlock’s life, a curiously generic name, has had frequent access to 221B, has studied Sherlock in depth, and even manages to appear in Sherlock’s “mind palace”. There are a number of villains in the canon who this character could evolve into.

    Yet another clue is Mycroft’s statement at the end of His Last Vow referencing a third Holmes brother. This exists in the text as well, but only in a very vague reference to another sibling that inherited the Holmes estate.

    Still another is Mrs. Holmes revealed as a renowned mathematician, the same as Professor Moriarty in the original text.

    Lastly, an often referenced plot conflict in the original stories is the account of Moriarty’s family. At one point the villian is only referred to as Professor Moriarty and his brother is James Moriarty. At another point, the villian is Professor James Moriarty with an unnamed brother. A third account refers to a Colonel Moriarty. While these conflicts were probably unintentional by Conan Doyle, they have become a bit of an inside joke for Sherlock lovers.

    So here’s a ridiculous, yet entertaining possibility. It seems that Gatiss and Moffat are setting up an old family rivalry, Holmes vs. Moriarty, with the emergence of new brothers on both sides. They may be giving us their take on the Moriarty family plot conflicts from the original text. Perhaps the Moriarty’s are the father, Professor James, and the two brothers, Jim Jr. who shot himself on the roof, and the brother colonel. Perhaps Anderson will emerge as this brother. Lest we forget, Jim Moriarty first appeared to Sherlock as an idiot too. And perhaps the rivalry stems from an old academic rivalry between their mathematician parents. Maybe something to do with the laws of combustion.

  • Nick

    The fat girl talking to Anderson was right, the Sherlock that fell off the roof was a doll/fake and after Sherlock and Moriaty let it fall off the roof, they kissed, so Sherlock covered up his death because they have a secret love affair. Boom. That’s how he did it.

  • John Smith

    Oh your so right

  • Sharkeisha Jaws

    Nope you are sooo stupid (snaps finger in C formation)

  • John Smith

    Savages. Savages. Your barely even human.

  • Sharkeisha Jaws

    You think I’m ignorant savage and you’ve been so many places I guess it must be so but still I can not see if the savage one is me how can there be so much you don’t know

  • Princez Elsa

    Let it goooo, let it goooo, cant hold it back anymore!

  • Stitch

    Ohana means family. And family means no one gets left behinh

  • Shaxster

    Nice theory…must be true!

  • Shaxster

    Ooh. Very, very nice theory. Could make the whole thing a little complex though.

  • Shaxster

    Brothers/twins is solid reasoning. They’d have to have incredibly similar personalities though.

  • Shaxster

    Yeah, that’s my main issue with the third theory. I’m fairly confident he’s coming back.

  • Simba

    She’s wrong. I can’t go back. What would it prove, anyway? You can’t change the past. You said you’d always be there for me! But you’re not. It’s because of me. It’s my fault. It’s my fault.

    [calling to the sky]

  • MasterWho

    A body double really isn’t all that unbelievable. Have you ever heard of political decoys? They look and act like who they are being. Sound like them too.

  • Moriarty’s mini me

    But notice how bipolar Moriarty is? That could easily be a cover up for being two seperate people.

  • CA

    I thought of the fake gun theory too (even though caps have still killed people irl but..television science). If that ends up being the case I’d say the blood was just his head bleeding from hitting the concrete and he was unconscious.

  • Dusty DooDoo

    What about Janine? I know it’s quite a stretch, but her involvement with Mary, then with Sherlock–all while working for the new antagonist Magnussen–is quite coincidental for this series, is it not? It may well be an insignificant detail, but her accent more closely resembles Moriarty’s as well; possibly suggestive of a familial relation? Then again, this is coming from a half-deaf American with no ear for this sort of thing. I’m just unnerved by how well Janine took to being knocked unconscious and used.

  • Shaxster

    Ooh. It’s not that coincidental though: Mary befriended her *because* she worked for Magnussen, as did Sherlock. And a lot of people are Irish 😉

  • Shaxster

    There was too much blood for it to just result from him hitting his head, but a squib wouldn’t be that difficult for him to use.

  • angryshortguy

    Moriarty is a genius.
    If anyone could figure out how to put a gun in his mouth, pull the trigger, and survive, he could.
    Depending on the caliber, the type of bullet, the amount of powder (force), and where the bullet struck, he could have figured out the safest place to shoot himself in the mouth and survived.
    Everyone was so fixated on Sherlock’s jump, that Moriarty’s accomplice(s) could have had ample time to replace the body with a double (head blown off to make identification difficult), fake the DNA results, and attend to him.

  • Kaity

    Nice theories , but I also heard in the actual Sherlock books Moriarty has a twin brother so maybe his twin is the one who appeared in the ending of season 3 and he’s going to be starting where his brother left off. Or maybe even the twin was the one who had died on the roof.

  • Tom

    Yes, the identical twin theory is probably my favorite right now, because there’s another big piece of evidence for this: Jim Brook! It wouldn’t be that simple, because as we know “Jim Brook” means reichenbach, the case that made Sherlock’s name. So, if that is actually his twin, then, Jim Brook isn’t actually his name, because it’s just an inside joke with sherlock. So that means that both Moriarty’s are in on it, and one of them was wiling to kill himself for defeating Sherlock. A little far fetched, but it’s the theory that I think is mostly likely true right now.

  • Leo Vader

    The one thing about them being twins is: if Moriarty reappeared he’d be less powerful than he used to be. Because there’s one less of him and all that. I’m sure they could find a workaround about how he’s motivated by revenge this time, but it still seems a little strange to me. Very well could be true though!

  • VeveJones

    Just adding another tidbit after recently reading the Moriarty story by Sir ACD. Moriarty’s brother’s name was James, which corresponds with the Jim on the show. We never know what Moriarty’s first name is, so it’s possible that “Jim” on the show alludes to the brother the entire time.

  • Rahul Verma

    Sherlock would surely notice the slightest of difference between the two twin brothers.

  • rose

    Sherlock never met his real foil. He used pawns that were willing do do his bidding. Moriarty was one of those pawns, and the famed ‘Miss Me?’ incident was pre-recorded/pre-made. His true foil plans to come back as himself OR with another pawn.

    I also like your Mycroft theory.

  • Nick

    I think Samual L Jackson isn’t actually real and is a fictional character played by Lauren Fishburne. He goes to auditions under the name Samuel L. Jackson and this proves he’s the best actor ever. Samuel L. Jackson is the most developed character of all time and he is the coolest fictional ever.

  • Sharkeisha Jaws

    Oh yeah Samuel L. Jackson. The L. Is for Lauren as in Lauren Fishburne! Conspiracy proven!

  • Sharkeisha Jaws

    *Laurence

  • sherlock

    i totally agree

  • sherlock

    you have a point there…

  • sherlock

    the cold never bothered me anyway

  • Mr man

    Moryarty did take the gun from Sherlock but I think one of his snipers shot near him so he did’nt have to die and he had a blood pouch in his suit also you don’t see moryarty pull the triger. That is my theory.

  • Alex Yeadon

    Maybe that ‘Rich’ guy we saw, the childrens TV presenter in series 2, was real. A twin, or somthing – moriarty (the real one) got him to take his place on the roof…

  • shreeja

    the gun was not fake , otherwise sherlock would have detected only by one look . the blood bag beneath his collar ? check . next comes the sound . i think moriarty had designed a music recorder in the gun. as soon as he pulled the trigger the music recorder turned on and made the sound of the gun. silly, but interesting.

  • shreeja

    the gun was NOT fake . OTHERWISE SHERLOCK WOULD HAVE RECOGNIZED IT ONLY BY ONE LOOK . THE BLOOD BAG BENEATH HIS COLLAR ? check. THERE IS /WAS NO CHEMISTRY AND LOVE AFFAIR BETWEEN SHERLOCK AND MORIARTY, OTHERWISE SEASON 4 WILL FLOP , IF THEY ARE TRYING TO BRING BACK MORIARTY. IMAGINE JUST. now comes the sound. i think that was a SPECIAL gun which moriarty had designed himself and it had a music recorder put by him in it. IT ONLY HAD THE SOUND OF GUN RECORDED AND WHEN HE PULLED THE TRIGGER , THE RECORDER WAS SWITCHED ON AND THE GUN SHOT SOUND CAME OUT . BOOOOOOOOM!!!!!! he is not dead . IT WILL BE INTERESTING.

  • shreeja

    that theory designed in season 3 ep1 was only for fan’s pleasure( sheriarty fans ).

  • shreeja

    that kiss was only for fan’s pleasure

  • Hurrrrr

    You just invented a terrible version of something that already exists. They are called blanks. You can shoot yourself in the head and the gun will bang but no bullet will come out. None of this sound recording nonsense.

  • blade afterburn

    A theory worth looking into

  • hheh

    underrated post

  • Shril

    What I am feeling is that moriarity is sibling of Holmes duo….n and Mycroft is the king on the chess board controlling every other piece

  • sherlock-fever

    By: mina (sherlock-fever)
    Some facts (theorys):
    1. Moriarty IS ALIVE.
    Why do you think they would put the last scene where he actually appears to audience. If it was just in the movie (appearing in all of the screens in England) it would be possible that someone else used his image (it wasn’t even his real voice) but the director made a last scene in which moriarty appears to audience asking “miss me?”

    2. Rich brook WAS FAKE
    Moriarty said it himself. “Did I almost get ya? Nobody seems to get the joke, but you do.” He says after their conversation about Richard Brook. Fake identity was part of his plan to destroy Sherlock.

    3. The scene of moriarty’s death was uncompleted and sherlock didn’t even check if he’s dead.
    The gun appeared in moriarty’s hand after it flew away from the exposure of the gun. This proves that some scenes where not shown in which sherlock prepared the fake dead body of moriarty to show it to his brother. (4. Mycroft was sure moriarty was dead and he was shocked when he heard the news) …

  • sherlock-fever

    OMG “IM so changeable” makes so much sense now

  • Anonymous

    With theory 2, I see what you are saying with a body double. How Sherlock would recognize the difference, but what if the person was never Moriarty? If this is the case, then there would never have been a difference for Sherlock to spot, and Moriarty could come back as anyone.

  • Edward Matupa

    I knew Moriarty was still alive from the moment he ‘killed himself” how could he just let himself lose like that?

  • mind palace

    i think moriarty put the gun in his mind and sherlock flew back and closedhis eyes at that moment moriarty swithces the gun to a fake which ould be in his left hand that is why the gun disappears from the right hand then shoot and fall on his back with a tube from his coat to his back with a bag of blood his weight squishes the blood and it comes out there were two streams of blood because when sherlock turn he switched the guns back to the orignal position