Spygate vs. Bounty
I am shocked that this is even a debate, but I wanted to see if this was solely my opinion or the vast majority. Okay since the Saint's "bounty" scandal or what have you people have been tossing around the idea that this is possibly worse than the Patriots famous "Spygate" scandal from the early to mid 2000's.
The issue I have with that is simply that the Pats were videotaping practice, which is outrageous. You can create a very effective gameplan with that type of material. The Saints were just putting money on the heads of certain player they would see. So at the end of the day they would have to rely on their skills and talents to get the money. I will admit it is far from okay to try and injure a professional player but in high school it was the same way but without the money. I wanted to hurt the other team every down.
But let me know what ye think.
__________________
--* BIGCOLBY*--
Quote:
Originally Posted by Farva
I watch my football in HD. I can see every scar on the players, and every make-up covered poc-mark on the face of the sideline reporters. I would have to believe that if I watched a porno in Blu-ray, I'd find myself noticing that pre-cancerous looking mole on that third girl from the left. I just want to see fake bouncing tits, not the surgical scars that put them there.
|
|